By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster on 13 August 2018
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
potato_hamster said:

Learn to read, Rol.

I did not confirm that Barkley understood my argument correctly.

If you want my arguments you can read them yourself. You are not worth the effort nor do you deserve any special treatment.

This is like the time when I said that Nintendo's IPs are much more valuable than Sega's and therefore Nintendo, unlike Sega, can turn a console into success with their games alone. You repeatedly responded in condescending manner and called it wishful thinking on my part despite ample evidence on this very site that supported my argument.

You simply can't handle the thought that Nintendo is successful, so you argue against it for the sake of arguing. Remember the huge argument where you were condescending to several Nintendo fans because they said that Switch would be Nintendo's only console as there wouldn't be a separate 3DS successor? You argued for pages that they can't be so sure about that, came up with one crazy reason after another and in the end admitted that you don't even believe yourself that there will be a separate 3DS successor.

So I have to ask this question: Do you sincerely believe that third party games are not selling well on Nintendo Switch?

Pst! Rol. I have a Switch. I have like 10 games for it. I have a pro controller for it. I've lost count of the number of times I've gotten an NES Classic or SNES Classic for myself or for as a gift for my friends and family. Why would I be upset that Nintendo is successful? I am supporting Nintendo directly and it benefits me to see them do well. I have spent more money on the last two years on Nintendo products than I have Sony, Microsoft and PC products combined. This whole narrative that I dislike Nintendo or want them to fail simply isn't true no matter how many times you assert that it is.

Also, based on the reading comprehension you've demonstrated in this thread, should it be a surprise to anyone that you're also misrepresenting previous arguments? I know you have the links to those comments documented somewhere.

You can ask whatever questions you like. I am not beholden to you to answer them. Besides the answer to that question is very clearly laid out over the course to this thread. Work on that reading comprehension and you might be able to figure it out.