curl-6 said:
That makes sense from a scummy business POV but it's anti-consumer and hence I don't consider it a good reason. |
Not sure they earn more sales from double dip than they lose from delayed release. But it surely would be anti-consumer to decide to release later just to get double dippers (although when budget is the question and releasing for less plat before makes the game release faster it can be acceptable)
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
