Wolfenstein 2 on Switch is a good product if you don't care about resolution...

[Mr Puggsly]

hunter_alien said:

Mr Puggsly said:

I actually replayed Killzone Mercenary a PS TV pretty recently. The visuals are actually pretty ugly, OG Xbox has more impressive FPS games.

Killzone Mercenary had a dynamic resolution so it gets really pixelated, textures are muddy, and the character models look like 6th gen quality. It looks okay compared to 6th gen stuff but the Switch easily does better.

Ummm no. I mean sure, if you blow ut up on a full HD screen (via PSTV) and compare it to the OG Xbox on a SDTV it might look somewhat comparable, but just recently having played HL2, Black, and DOOM 3 on the OG Xbox (and just last year went trough Riddick) I can guarantee you that they come nowhere near of pulling off stuff that were done in KZ:M. Lightning, environment detail, character models and especially weapons look considerably better in KZ:M. Obviously KZ2/3 look better but KZ:M most deffinatly stands roughly on the same level as cross-gen 6th/7th gen FPSs on the later gen systems.

 

I'm honestly telling you the screenshot is not reflective of how the game generally looks. Its simply not that sharp, seems like better color in the picture, the lighting appears to be better. I'm not gonna deny that was taken from the game, it just resemble what I played for some reason.

This DF video is more reflective of my experience. Dull lighting and color, the texture quality is also at par with PS2. Its a solid game though and wasn't really designed for a TV. While Wolfenstein 2 was given its a Switch game.

 

As far OG Xbox, I think Splinter Cell CT, Doom, Far Cry Instincts and Riddick show the hardware is capable of some impressive lighting and character models. Some of that stuff is at par with Killzone Mercenary.