Kasz216 said:
Except... Sony is claiming the same thing for the DS. Which doesn't meet any of your qualifications. So... no.... your wrong. That's now why they're saying it. If you ask me it's because Sony and Microsoft care less about videogames and more about entertainment. The design philospy of Nintendo is to make a system that plays games... period. They follow the company motto. Do one thing exceptionally. They don't even like to own other buisnesses selling them off whenever they aquire something related to the VG buisness. While the other two companies are more interested in taking over your living room. Either one would do anything for that... as it's a much larger piece of the pie as far as money goes. Well also Microsoft more wants Sony to not get a hub, as a thing like the Playstation 3 controlling your living room is basically "like" a PC... and that could be a mega inroad into the PC market hurting their profitability. The Wii isn't going to take over anyones movie collection or sound system or anything else... so it doesn't challenge their ulitamte goal it just delays it.timedia device... that primarily was trying to push UMDs. Though that failed, it stil has other non game uses. It's the same with the PSP. The PSP isn't really a game system... it's really more a mul |
Well, he asked about "companies." As if he would be implying both Microsoft and Sony. Since Microsoft doesn't have a handheld, my first thought turned to the home console race. And the PSP is still getting a lot of games that the DS isn't, even if many of them are first party. The problem is that there isn't a third leg in the handheld race for comparision. I'm sure that if Microsoft had a handheld in the race, similar to the PSP, that the PSP and Microsoft's handheld would both get a lot of games that the DS wouldn't get, despite the DS being the market leader. A lot of it comes down to demographics.
So no, I'm not wrong. You're (notice the spelling?) wrong about that.
