By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
CrazyGamer2017 said:

Yeah and where do you see me saying otherwise? 3K, 38K or even 300K doesn't change the fact that the Switch does all that the 3DS does but better so why would Nintendo even come up with the Switch if they don't mean for it to replace the 3DS at some point?

It doesn't work as a Pokemon console better.

3DS has access to literally every single generation of Pokemon games (remakes only for gen 3), while Switch has... Pokemon Quest and that's it

Only because Nintendo is not adding those games to the Switch. They can add them anytime they want, I mean there is no technical reason to prevent this, right?

I'm only speculating of course but I wouldn't count on the 3DS to have a successor or rather I should say it does have one and that is the Switch.

Or do you guys think Nintendo plans to keep both systems going in parallel beyond a certain point in time? Furthermore do you think Nintendo plans to add a successor to the 3DS that is not the Switch as in a non hybrid dedicated portable system?