By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
routsounmanman said:
Jumpin said:

Because there’s a contingent of “Nintendo fans” - more accurately put Gamecube fans - who always want to put themselves in the role of the victim. This group rose up strongly  in the Gamecube era when everyone called it a kiddy system, and we’ve been plagued with their perpetual-victim hood ever since.

Sorry, I’m probably more annoyed by the association with this victim mentality (as a Nintendo fan) than you are =P

But I agree, this seems like a fairly cool idea in running a high fidelity game on the Switch, and 20USD is about the cost of a lunch or two. Not bad for a 180 day rental for a game made for a high-end box console.

OK, the only way you can not be seeing this is being completely biased. I can give you RE7 (although I can bet money that this could be ported with average results). 

But, how they've handled the Switch is completely ridiculous and insulting. I feel like they are doing the bare minimum to mop up any extra money they can make on their games, in order to fund their next games on other platforms. 

How is MHW on PC and Xbox more justified than a Switch version? Why is Okami HD not a simultaneous release alongside every other platform? This game literally screams Nintendo. How come we don't have a Street Fighter V or even IV version after the sales of the ROM they released on the Switch's launch?

How about all the half game on cartridge / half eshop fiasco, just to save money on ROMS! They are treating Switch owners like crap, but I guess it is easier to always blame Nintendo, right? 

When are you going to realize the videogame business isn’t about what you think Capcom owes you? And when will you realize you’re not actually a victim of Capcom’s so-called unjustifiable policies?



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.