By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Snoopy said:
jason1637 said:

1. That 50.4% finished the first mission so they didnt just press start on it.

2. Most single player games average like 30% completetion and since CoD is multiplayer focus and has 222% completetion thats actually not bad. Also WW2 has a total of 25m players so a little bit more than 12.5m played the campaign and 5.5m finished it. Thats a large number to make the campaign worth it. Most single player only games dont even reach 5.5 or 12.5m in sales.

3. For Bo4 they already started the campaign but stopped it because they did not have enough time to finish it.

1. Cool, 50% people followed an AI soldier and watched a few cutscenes. Great!

2. 22% is less than 30% by quite a lot. Especially since COD campaigns are short.

3. They should have never continued it and should go all out on multiplayer. They probably didn't even get halfway through and realize campaigns are worthless for COD.

About 35% of all WW2 players haven't even managed to kill 10 people online. That should be easily possible within a few rounds, even for a terrible player.
It's fair to say that ~50% of all players haven't spent more than 1 or 2 hours online.