John2290 said:
So no one is allowed to criticize them? Point out when they are wrong or retort their political activism because they are teens. Will this change the day he turns 18? Hmm. No wonder the left leaning media are using them, they are the perfect weapon for pushing the agenda of the day and a shield when people try to debate that agenda. If these kids want to be free of criticism and/or any hurtful comments then they need to get of the stage. If Hogg can't take a simple jab at his ego without acting like a child then he can not ask to be treated like an adult when discussing policy that effect peoples lives and then revert to the "I'm only 17" retort every time someone says something negative. They can't have it both ways here and in Stalones defense I'm sure many people do want to punch him in the face, he's an obvious narcassist and does give off a spoiled, power tripping vibe that is very obnoxious. |
Oh my God can you read?
You can criticize them for their arguments and the points they are making. Laura Ingraham obviously disagrees with him for his stance on gun regulation so attacking his response to not getting into college to further her agenda (demeaning the kid and therefore his argument) is out of the scope of the debate. It is a cheap shot. His response was effective and did not call for any violence whatsoever.
In a thread where you the OP asks if David Hogg is a bully you come to the defense of Frank Stallone who is advocating for violence against the kid. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. Do you have any self awareness at all? At what point in Stallone's tweet does he go after Hogg's argument instead of him personally. It does not really matter that Hogg is 17, advocating violence against anyone because you do not like there argument means you are in the wrong and you cannot articulate a good counterargument.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo
Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.







