By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
contestgamer said:
VGPolyglot said:

Well, considering all of the sponsors that dropped her following this it appears that he already had at least a certain degree of power.

Among Hippos, only the biggest, strongest male can wield power and it works the same way with most mammalian species. For people that historically equated to those with the most money and connections to other people in power being able to wield over others. That's natural.

But why is any of this a problem? Your argument seems to be fundamentally traditionalist, disparaging change just because it is different, but there is no ethical foundation to the power of money. In fact, shouldn't morals hold a stronger ethical core than money?

Who cares what is "natural"?