contestgamer said:
Among Hippos, only the biggest, strongest male can wield power and it works the same way with most mammalian species. For people that historically equated to those with the most money and connections to other people in power being able to wield over others. That's natural. |
But why is any of this a problem? Your argument seems to be fundamentally traditionalist, disparaging change just because it is different, but there is no ethical foundation to the power of money. In fact, shouldn't morals hold a stronger ethical core than money?
Who cares what is "natural"?