By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azuren said:
Medisti said:

Your point seems to be Funimation, who do not actually have the rights to Goku for something like this by the way, made a joke tweet, just like a bunch of other companies have done about having characters in Smash. Ergo, you have no point.

Oh cool, you weren't paying attention. I'm so surprised.

 

The point is no one in power related to Superman or Madden called for their characters in Smash, whether or not you perceive it as a joke. So when you hop in here saying "So we should add ____ and ____ because they have video games, too" is not an apt comparison. Not only are those not characters with with a video game background that surpasses their other mediums in quantity (and at many points, quality), but they're not part of this conversation because Warner and EA haven't said anything about it.

 

And yes, before you distract yourself with a tangent about how Funimation doesn't own Goku, I'm wildly aware. But they are still in an official position that represents Goku in the west, giving their word more credence than mine or yours.

 

To summarize: We're discussing characters who have a long history of games and who were recommended in Smash by someone who represents them. Quit setting up strawmen.

You're still yet to disprove the long-standing stance by Sakurai that characters who originated outside of video games won't be in Smash. Until you do that, you have no argument.