By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CrazyGamer2017 on 21 March 2018
Edit Thread
GoOnKid said:
CrazyGamer2017 said:

If you really did not want to waste your time, you shouldn't have replied period. But you did because you couldn't resist the need to be condescending. As for a serious discussion, I usually expect one from people who can take criticism and divergent opinions so don't worry I'm obviously not expecting that from you.

Sorry but the one who is condescending is clearly you. You called people who buy Labo unable to reognize what it is. And you said everything that NIntendo shits out is bought by the masses. Both is wrong. Both is easily disproven. How can you even believe something like this? smh

I speak of Labo whereas you pass off as too important to "waste your time" to reply to my "nonsense" which is the very definition of condescending. I on the other hand did not speak of you, I don't shoot the messenger I criticize the message and that's the difference here.

I don't know where you see that I say people can't recognize what Labo is. What I did say is that people will probably buy it cause it's Nintendo who made it (opinion) as I believe that if it was Sony or Microsoft who would have made this, people wouldn't have cared for it. So are you going to shoot me cause I think Labo will be more successful under Nintendo than it would under Sony or Microsoft?

And yes I don't approve of Labo and I talk about how I feel about Labo (again opinion) in a thread made to discuss Labo's success or lack thereof. But perhaps that too is reason enough to shoot me...