By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MDMAlliance on 19 February 2018
Edit Thread
Aeolus451 said:
MDMAlliance said:

The point of linking that article was, in fact, to prove that humans do not have a "biological race."  

You are also making arguments without any sources here.  Also your generalizations are not at all universal.  A lot of what you described can be explained by a lot of different things.  Asians having a "problem with dairy products" (otherwise known as being lactose intolerant) has a lot more to do with the Asian population not drinking milk historically.  It's an adaptive trait that has nothing to do with being Asian itself, and makes no sense to call it "race" when it isn't even universal.  Humans as a whole were generally lactose intolerant until a bunch of them started drinking milk.   Your argument is weak at best.

 

edit:  I'd like to point out that with certain studies, it is useful to use "race" as a label since it is a well-recognized one and IS useful for studies in psychology and sociology.  Which are "soft sciences" and not "hard."  

Also "geological races" doesn't make sense since there are no hard boundaries in geology.

Alot of what saying is verifiable. I'm not gonna source easy to find things especially when you're opposing my points in a knee jerk reaction without looking up anything to see if I'm right or wrong. You're being intellectually lazy and wasting my time. 

I've actually provided a source in this thread already, and I don't need a source to tell what you're saying isn't a real thing in science.  I've actually did research this subject before.