By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
MDMAlliance said:
ITT: A bunch of people arguing that race is a scientific reality in humans without doing any research, then refusing to accept articles of actual science disagreeing with them.

Accept those articles are nothing more than bullshit spout of ideologies. The field of medical science has shown time and time again that there is existence of race on a physiological basis ... 

Social scientists can't comprehend race on a biological basis compared to biologists or physicians since that is not their field of expertise no matter how they don't want it ... (social scientists with their liberal crap aren't qualified to say anything about whether races exist or not)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23684745

This isn't a social science article, but a biomedical one.  If you did any real research, you'd see that the vast majority of anything you'd find would support the statement that race is not a biological reality.  

Here's an important question to ask yourself:  How do you define race?  What are the criteria for what is "black" or "white" or any other "race" you can think of?  Do all members of said "race" express the traits you defined?  Do other "races" NOT share these traits?  If you really understood what science is, you'd quickly come to an answer on that with all the data available.