palou said:
It is, for the very least, relevant as context that these works are within a larger series of works of recreations of historical paintings that replace the main subjects with black individuals. I think, with that in mind, it's somewhat believable that the intention of the artist in the creation of the work was innocent.
http://popcurious.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/3Charles.jpg
http://www.irequireart.com/i/artwork/882-image-1600-1600-fit.jpg
https://rfc.museum/images/stories/BtC/Wiley-K/Wiley-K_TriplePortraitOfCharles_I.jpg |
http://nymag.com/arts/art/rules/kehinde-wiley-2012-4/
'But one already stands out: a tall, elegant black woman in a long blue dress—the canvas is enormous, eight feet by ten feet—calmly staring down the viewer. In one hand, she holds a knife. In the other, a cleanly severed brunette female head. “It’s sort of a play on the ‘kill whitey’ thing,” Wiley says.'
Nope - he's racist.