NintendoPie said:
The fundamentals of the reasoning are flawed. The Switch has had a better first year as a games console than multiple years of the XBO, and anyone with a sense of clarity can tell that, going forward, the Switch will continue to have better games output than the XBO. This has been basically proven and discussed multiple times, it shouldn't really be an odd thing to point out. I saw your other post and I can only hope that you questioned my post purely because you thought it odd that people buy a worse console just on precedence, I forgive you for that assumption. |
So it's sales of the hardware that determine it's output/library- but we only count games going forward, ignore Nintendos relationship with third parties and the XBO's overlap with the PS4 (the market leader)?
Sounds like cherrypicking to me. Let's use the Wii- better first year than the 360 (outside of a preference for first party games), the 360 undoubtedly has the better and deeper library. It also sold far, far more games than the Wii.
You can't ignore common sense and patterns within the industry, then claim another users reasoning is flawed when you're clearly not looking at the full picture.
