By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TruckOSaurus said:
caffeinade said:

Not to mention, not having any indicator for how long the thread is.

Something like:
1 2 3 4 ... 100  >>  >>|
or
1 2 3 4 ... 100 [Textbox]
Is much more usable.

I must of just misclicked, hitting a page number, getting a negative feedback response, and never double checked.
Odd.

This is what the pagination will look like on the new design:

That's pretty good. As a minor improvement, I suggest adding '...' (or something similar, as long as it fits) between page numbers that aren't consecutive. For example, in your picture, 1 and 9 aren't consecutive, so you might want to add '...' between them. I've also seen arrows be used for that. Otherwise at first glance it might be easy to think they're consecutive pages and end up somewhere you didn't expect.