RJTM1991 said:
Well, no, you listed a bunch of terrible cash-ins and tried to push that as proof. You can say whatever you want, it's completely different. And those terrible cash-ins got poor or mediocre review scores for being poor or mediocre games. The good games got good scores. See how this works? "And you can have an opinion on games you most likely have never played all you want. Your opinions become worthless when you haven't played said games though." Who said I haven't played them? OK, have you played them? The site's called NintendoLife, it's run by hardcore Nintendo fans who owe their current jobs to Nintendo, and I'm guessing that they'll get review copies and other things sent to them too, but they're totally not biased, right? You're just blindly defending a fansite because you're a fan, I think it's pretty pointless to continue this I'm defending a site because I visit it regularly and am familiar with it enough to know that it doesn't shill for reviews just because it has Nintendo in the name. If you had any history of visiting NL before this thread, you would have said so already. But you don't, you came into this thread and you made a blind assumption based on one review. Let me put it this way: if I was on NintendoLife's forums and someone said "VGChartz is just a bunch of idiots making up game sales off the top of their heads just to sound smart," then I'd explain to that person the work and process that the members here use to get their numbers. If that makes me a blind VGC fanboy, then sure, whatevs.
|