| Shaunodon said:
|
Hold up. My original comment might have, in literal terms, mentioned low framerate and low resolution, but the comment wasn't about that. It wasn't about that at all. I brought them up as a matter of fact. Because, of course someone who is selling a product wouldn't want a negative aspect to be emphasized. That's the point of my original comment, not frame rate or resolution, but the developer's words. So again, I wasn't a "caricature" of what the developer is talking about, I literally didn't care about arguing resolution or framerate till you said I did. Then I felt I needed to expand on it. You know this, so I don't know why you're playing the fool. It takes but a glance at the original comment to understand my point, and it had nothing to do with the port quality but the developer's intent.
"They delivered Doom last year with a great framerate, and great visuals, and probably never expected they'd be porting it to a handheld. Expecting them to have a version ready that could have complete parity with PS4/Xbone is just unreasonable."
Wait a minute ... so your conclusion about DOOM on Switch is literally the same conclusion I have about the port ... yet you started a huge argument because ... ? Again, this just shows that you need to calm down, read a post and try to understand what's being communicated. I never criticized the port in my original comment(even further comments were just explaining the importance of resolution and frame rate, not that the port was bad). So there was no need for these rants to begin - all I was getting at was that the intent by the developer is uncertain and there is no use using their words as an argument or fact for why a port is great. Use someone else's words, use facts, use your opinions but their words? That is shakey ground.
"I'm not sure why you're using this as fuel for your crusade, when it's obvious they're quite devoted to bringing the best possible versions of their games they can. But they're also not miracle workers.""
Crusade? What are you even talking about? I'm not attacking the dev. I'm not attacking you. I'm agreeing with you and saying the dev did a good job. I'm just providing a counter-point as to why the devs words should not be used as a frame of discussion or argument. How is that a crusade? You keep saying you aren't making negative replies out of a specific bias, but then out of nowhere you say i'm on a crusade! Or earlier that no one asked for my viewpoint .. even though you continue to be interested in it. You keep bringing up these random characterizations that literally have no place in the discussion. Is a normal discussion too much to ask?
