Wyrdness said:
I didn't try I actually did find one, here's a simple question that highlights it is the Switch a powerful portable for this era? Also learn to read context. "it's still state of the art for portable platforms" Where does this line say it's only a portable? It highlights that as a hybrid it's still a state of the art portable as well so again you've either assumed or not read things properly. You can't go off arguing about state of the art then choose to ignore key parts of a platform's concept that's being heavily selective you may not be interested in the portable side of things but it still factors into the equation. |
You really love arguing for the sake of arguing. I don't care that you think it's great as a portable, it may very well be and I have never said otherwise, I'm AGAIN ONLY saying it's weak as a home console, you know the thing you plug on a TV which is how I would use it which is why I speak of the home console part of it, what part of this you don't get?
Being selective has nothing to do with it as I clearly say AS A HOME SYSTEM, whereas you choose to ignore this and keep talking about the portable part as if my analysis EVER made reference to that part. Why do you even bring that part into this convo when everyone INCLUDING ME AGREE it's a decent system when used as a portable? (With exception made to the battery life) Is there some kind of war going on between you and logic?
This is the last time I say it to you as repeating it beyond this point becomes redundant. Believe and understand whatever you want, it does not change the facts of the matter.
Take care.







