By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
StarDoor on 30 September 2017
Edit Thread
BraLoD said:
Nautilus said:

I will give you that you are right about the PC statement.Since I am more biased towards console gaming, and thus while I do still believe on what I said simply because thats my preference, PC is still factually better.Should have formulated that part better.For everything else I stand by what i said.You just need to remember that this is my opinion and, since you are obviosly more a PS centric gamer(and biased against Nintendo.Remember your "Nintendo should go third party" thread?), you will not agree with me.As for Nintendo being the best developer in the world, thats simply a "factual" truth.If you go by personal tastes then yeah sure, it depends on what you like and all, but Nintendo keeps getting best GOTY awards through the years, their games keep being reverenced as the best, and not only by their own fanbase, for a reason.Thats in part because Nintendo has a shitton studios that keeps pouring games of different genres, but they are all still Nintendo.And I mean, Nintendo is the oldest videogames company, or at least one of the oldest, that not only develops software but also hardware for a reason.

And also I said they have the best launch year ever.Im sure Im not alone in this, and thats not only in the Nintendo side of things.

As for the rest, sure Mr. Sherlock.

What's factual truth about it? Prove me with those facts, then. Hint: you can't.

And are you for real? Nintendo doesn't have a game that win the most goty awards since what, the gamecube with Metroid Prime? lol.

Also, how am I biased against Nintendo? By the time I had a PlayStation I had already played a good lot of SNES and Gameboy and got a GBA later, plus a 3DS this year, though this last one I sold right after because it was modded, and I'm waiting for the N2DS XL gets a decent pricing here to get it. I may preffer Sony over Nintendo, that I do, but how am I biased against it? The thread you used as an example is an opinion I still support, Nintendo should go third party, the Switch has only made me support it more, actually. An overpriced piece of hardwarehardware with overpriced accessories with artificial demand, yeah, my point of it being bad at making hardware has been greatly supported by it.

As I said there, Nintendo does good software but doesn't has a clue on how to make hardware. People might have been supporting it more than I though, yes they are, but that's too bad, as I can only see Nintendo growing stronger with a full software focus than wasting time and your money as well, by sticking with making hardware as well. You may disagree with me on that, but that doesn't make me biased against it, it makes that, you disagree with me, and that's it.

Right... you say you're not biased against Nintendo while at the same time spouting ignorant nonsense about Switch having artificial demand and being "bad hardware". I guess you just can't comprehend that the market as a whole likes Switch much more than you do.

Now, calling Nintendo the best developer is a matter of taste. However, we can definitely say that more people would call Nintendo the best developer than any other studio:

http://www.vgchartz.com/gamedb/?name=&publisher=1167&platform=&genre=&minSales=0&results=200

Name another company that has made 17 games that sold over 20 million copies, and 39 games that sold over 10 million copies.

Of the top ten highest-rated games of all time, Nintendo published half of them. (5 according to Metacritic, 6 according to GameRankings)

You're calling Nautilus biased, but then you deny that you have any bias at all? Ridiculous.