By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 on 18 September 2017
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
Aeolus451 said:

All I was saying that 32 gb of storage wasn't enough hd space for playing even 7th gen 3rd party games without needing to buy a micro SD card to even play a game and that nintendo needs to offer SKUs with better storage then some of them started to get defensive over common sense saying they don't better SKUs.

I don't think you can talk about using common sense when it was only a month ago that you predicted 30-40m units lifetime for Switch.

Your understanding of common sense is what led people to say that Nintendo needs to cater to AAA third parties if they want to have a successful console again. Since Switch wasn't such a console, they predicted failure for it. But using actual common sense and looking at sales data, the chance for success for Nintendo was multiple times higher by rejecting to suck up to AAA third parties. Therefore it was logical to predict success for Switch despite the lack of AAA third party games.

Now your common sense leads you specifically to suggest that Nintendo needs a Switch SKU with more built-in storage, otherwise AAA third parties may not want to develop for the system. Why would that even be a problem when Nintendo doesn't need AAA third party games to be successful? If AAA third parties can't develop for Switch as it is, then too bad for them as it means no money for them. Switch will continue to be successful with or without them, so common sense is that Nintendo does not need to offer multiple SKUs.

Almost all of that has nothing to do with this topic and frankly, it's just a jab at me. If you want to debate, then go after my points. Stop acting so petty.