Wyrdness said:
The break down of the Switch shows the is no space in the device, you've offered no alternative way to increase storage with out significantly increasing costs yet still harp on about they can do it. Here's a news flash for you they've given owners an option for more storage it's called micro SD cards and they're cheaper than adding internal flash storage to the point you can buy one and the Switch for cheaper than if the Switch had more internal flash storage. Fact is it's not being against more storage it's realizing the trade off for it you've refused to answer whether you'd pay 100-110 quid more for a Switch because you know you and most consumers wouldn't as it would be at an obscene price. |
All I'm saying is that 32 GB is not enough to play alot of 3rd party games on the NS and that will likely turn off 3rd party devs. It woudn't hurt for nintendo to create another sku to offset it. Doesn't nintendo offer more than one sku on their consoles? Then why are some of you so against the idea of a common sense fix. I'm not saying that nintendo should replace all sku with the upgraded option. I don't need to offer any suggestions because that has nothing to do with my points and I never gave the impression that I would offer any suggestion. That's a just distraction. I only said that 32 gb of storage is not good enough for a 9th gen console when it can't play 7th gen games without needing a micro SD card just to play games. You don't know what it would cost for an SKU with better storage so stop pretending that you know specific costs. You don't lose shit with SKUs being available with better hardware so please stop being stubborn for the sake of it. Some of you said the same sort of thing when people said that the wii u lacked HD space and that it should offer SKUs with more storage. It's amazing the amount of resistance some of ya give over common sense features being suggested on a nintendo console.
