SpokenTruth said:
Of course but when resources are limited as they are in a portable device, no developer is going to render higher than screen output. The anti-aliasing benefit just isn't worth it. |
Hence the "you aren't wrong".
| SpokenTruth said: 1) Very few people were making this claim and they were touted as morons by all of us and they've not been heard from since. 2) The Switch patent actually shows it doign VR. 3-4) What do these have to do with "'member when the NX was supposed to be more powerful than the PS4 + being a portable??"
In fact, far more people were claiming that Skyrim on Switch would not be the remaster edition (we know it is now) than there were people claiming Switch to be more powerful than PS4 and portable. |
There was one user who kept claiming the Wii U was more powerful than the Xbox One/Playstation 4 because the eDRAM had more bandwidth.
You can't make this stuff up.
This forum used to be full of allot of crazies a few years back. Haha
Otter said:
This was never a thing though |
Nope.
If you go back before the NX was even rumored to be a "Hybrid". There were all sorts of rumors on what the hardware might be.
There was also a reddit user last year who claimed it was more powerful than the Playstation 4 as well... Many users in these forums fapped at the possibility. Haha
https://gamerant.com/nintendo-nx-ps4-power-rumor/
http://wccftech.com/nintendo-nx-technically-powerful-ps4xb1-easy-develop-rumor/
http://en.yibada.com/articles/125227/20160521/nintendo-nx-more-powerful-playstation-neo-xbox-two-wont-replace.htm
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/150143/20160415/nintendo-nx-reportedly-more-powerful-than-ps4-by-a-noticeable-amount-in-cpu-gpu-and-memory-more-details.htm
I enjoy a good debate. And I enjoyed debating with those hilarious performance claims that many on these forums legitimately believed.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite








