By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dravenet7 on 14 August 2017
Edit Thread
fatslob-:O said:
Dravenet7 said:

Too hard for you to go back and read the previous sentence, eh? For me to be in denial post less than half of what I said in 5 posts and claim that was my only point. Oh wait...

You can claim I'm feigning ignorance or prove it by quoting the full paragraph to prove that it wasn't an interpretation, but you won't because you can't.

And there is no false equivilancy != I claim you made a false equivilancy. How the hell did you get this? Actually nevermind. If anyone follows this string of posts, its made quite clear that I proved my points and backed them up, and you made allegations you can't prove a single one.

Enjoy mulling that over.

I don't care about your interpretation of what Azuren said, it's the claims that you raised up ... 

And you're the one who made the false equivalencies by trying to reinterpret my arguments only to be shit up with your naive simplification ... 

It's hilarious how you jump to claim conclusion, that's the behaviour you see from an internet strongman ... 

 Good day to you on fabricating my arugments then denying a statement that you made ... 

This is your 3rd post stating I am in denial. The second time (the first time is the one where I crossed it off and ignored it because I only cared about the strawman accusation, only reading it now) I responded to that with something along the lines of you can't prove it.

I'll make this very easy for you: Instead of simply claiming that I am in denial, why don't you quote the paragraph I said this, in its entirely, and prove it from there? When I made a claim, I actually did that to back it up, and everyone who looks at these posts can see this for themselves. So if you can simply do that, I'll gladly accept I was in denial and continue with this waste of time. Otherwise I'll continue to see your responses as immature and you should keep silent.