By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
curl-6 said:

When you have to reach back in time to a discussion that took place over half a year ago and has zero relevance to the topic at had, you're clearly reaching.

Other M has objectively flawed camera and control systems and numerous sequences of pace-killing forced walking and pixel hunting. If it were made by any other company you would not defend it.

Except I would defend it from another company I defended The Order when that got trashed by people as well as others, you being on tilt because I have a differing view is not my problem.

OM has a camera that follows you through play that aren't many cases of limited visibility like you claimed that's a lie, if you read the post you'd see I highlighted the first person parts as an issue the fact that you're baning on about the same thing I flat out pointed out as a problem highlights an agenda on your part to just rant your point through. The pace killing isn't even as bad as you claimed, what's even more laughable here is this is between two Nintendo games one of which I have played down yet you still go off on the typical you're defending them tantrum, it's not me reaching here it's you, I gave an example of the type of wavelength you're sometimes on.

Point being OM is an ok game with some flaws a view that is not uncommon yet here you are on tilt over it.

Ad hominem attacks are the hallmark of a weak argument.

The camera does not adjust when backtracking. Video proof, from 3:42. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bdy1VaD0gk