Currently Online 
| TH3-D0S3R said: It doesn't matter whether or not they are relaying the information in a manner that could be interpreted as a lie, the information they are relaying IS a lie. You can say well they may have done this or that, but there is no evidence to further support it. They've investigated this for quite a while even before election night where the FBI wiretapped Trump Tower to go a few floors below his in order to get in on illegal actions by other occupants. Odds are if they found something involving Russian collusion, they would have found it by now, but they haven't, and most likely they never will find this supposed information. You're holding onto blind faith and hope that a man you don't see favorably gets exposed, when you don't have anything to expose him of. I get it, you don't like Donald Trump, but please, stop attempting to defend CNN in this case. They openly just told you to your face about false information spread to misinform the public. Just because it favors the attack on Trump doesn't mean it's good, in fact many people who are kinda stuck in the middle see it as just wrong. |
Why would you assume that wiretapping the Russian Mafia between 2011 and 2013 would find evidence of collusion between the Russian government and the then non-existant Trump campaign? Using that as a means of undercutting the investigation makes me seriously scratch my head.
