Slightly better than the XB showing, but worse than Ubisoft. I didn't expect PS to try all that hard since they didn't require an earth shattering performance to stay on par, if not slightly outdo their main competition. Coming close to last years show was not going to be an easy task either. 7/10 is respectable.
I assume some of this has to do with the fact that PS clearly decided to show games coming soon, instead of years from now. It makes me wonder how many other soon to be released games they are just holding off for other shows this year, or how many may get delayed. Is it to keep a constant flow of game news until the holidays, as well as have backup against possible disruptive competitor news?
I also can't help but ponder if due to the quiet PS5 talk, that PS is either thinking of launching sooner than later, or if they are just unsure as of now, and don't want to announce any distant future games for PS4, that may potentially end up being PS5 exclusive maybe?
E3 as a whole so far has been quite "meh". Otherwise PS would have gotten a worse score than it did.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
