| Peh said: 1. You miss one important point. Freesync relies on the integrated display controller inside the GPU. It's still partly hardware based. Thus, the GPU being from Nvidia, it misses the essential hardware for using Freesync. It is simply not purely based on software. If this would be the case, AMD would just update all the older GPU's. Freesync = Hardware / Software Yes, the Tegra X1 is not connected to the display via hdmi or any other display. But according to what I just wrote, it's not worth mentioning it anymore. So an adaptive refreshrate inside the Switch will not be possible. |
You are missing the point of an open standard and nintendo employing nVidia to customize the SoC.
It was entirely possible before the consoles release. Heck it's still possible with a refresh of the hardware, nothing you have stated changes that fact.
| Peh said: Dock implementation.. I don't know, because just a HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.2a or newer interface will still need the hardware necessary for FreeSync. So, delevoping a controller which takes over this task from the GPU. I don't think Nvidia will comply. But this entire argument is pure speculation. |
The Dock can have a seperate/updated chip to handle all that you know.
| Peh said: 2. Again, 1994-1996 how many people owned a CRT TV which did a higher resolution then PAL, NTSC and SECAM? How widespread were those. Did Nintendo took those CRT TV's into account? |
They don't have to resolve a higher resolution than the 4:3 PAL, NTSC or SECAM standards to exceed the Nintendo 64's capabilities. The Nintendo 64 wasn't meeting those standards for the majority of of it's games.
| Peh said: 3. Not denying my statement. |
Nor confirming it.
Go look up Australian slang and what it means.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
