Pemalite said:
1. You don't get it. Freesync being open standard means it can be implemented on non-standard non-AMD interfaces as per Display Port and HDMI.
2. But CRT TV's did often exceed the resolutions determined by PAL, NTSC and SECAM standards.
3. It often ran at a fraction of the resolution.
|
1. You miss one important point. Freesync relies on the integrated display controller inside the GPU. It's still partly hardware based. Thus, the GPU being from Nvidia, it misses the essential hardware for using Freesync. It is simply not purely based on software. If this would be the case, AMD would just update all the older GPU's.
Freesync = Hardware / Software
G-Sync = Hardware / Hardware
Yes, the Tegra X1 is not connected to the display via hdmi or any other display. But according to what I just wrote, it's not worth mentioning it anymore. So an adaptive refreshrate inside the Switch will not be possible.
Dock implementation.. I don't know, because just a HDMI 2.1 or DP 1.2a or newer interface will still need the hardware necessary for FreeSync. So, delevoping a controller which takes over this task from the GPU. I don't think Nvidia will comply. But this entire argument is pure speculation.
2. Again, 1994-1996 how many people owned a CRT TV which did a higher resolution then PAL, NTSC and SECAM? How widespread were those. Did Nintendo took those CRT TV's into account?
3. Not denying my statement.
Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | RTX 3090 FE| Crappy Monitor| HTC Vive Pro :3







