By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
curl-6 said:

The burden of proof is on those claiming something unproven exists.

no its on the person who made the original claim, which was you 3 days ago:

"A 3 year old port isn't going to be a strong system seller, and ARMS is unproven, so Switch sales could slump considerably in May-June, though hopefully not so badly that Splatoon 2 can't kick-start it again in July."

since that point you have been arguing that its not hyped and not a system seller with nothing to back it up.

I don't have to prove a negative, until such time as something is proven to exist, the default position is that it doesn't.