There are A LOT of assumptions in this thread......and this CD drive thing.....I just can't see it. Nintendo just made stupid mistakes with the N64 AND the GC that followed it. Both has some great games but compared to the competition they just did not have enough games......at all.
You can't say well take away this, this and this from Sony and Nintendo would have won. That type of logic always confuses me....so leave one company the exact same and take away from the other so that Company A would win over Company B......you could literally flip things like that for any and every company. Why not just say The company that won just simply made better decisions period. The what if stuff for something over 20 years old is crazy lol.
A good read indeed but I can't agree with it personally. Sony had the better games...period.....whether they be 1st, 2nd or 3rd party is irrelevant. It isn't the fault of Sony that Nintendo screwed up and made silly business decisions.
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...
PSN: StlUzumaki23
