RolStoppable said:
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7505013 There you go. A double standard in full force, putting Mario Kart 8's DLC on the same or a worse level than Naughty Dog's practices. |
Not the thread I was talking about, but fine, if you're ready to go read posts from September 2015....
So, once again, please read the threads, it will be better.
The subject there was the micro-transactions being Pay To Win or not for the online multiplayer of The Last of Us. I said that the micro-transactions were here to pay for the developers managing the multiplayer after the release of the game, and that as a player I didn't find the micro-transactions to be Pay To Win.
| Faelco said: Yes, it would be better if everything was free, but in this case there wouldn't be any developer to manage this, or we should buy a lot of hats to cover the costs. If some people want to pay a rifle shooting 4 bullets in a row instead of 3 but at the price of 1 normal rifle plus another weapon or skill, I won't blame them. |
And I took MK8 as another example of multiplayer mode evolving after release and selling those evolutions. (EDIT: Oh, I get it now! For you, saying "What Sony and Nintendo are both doing is perfectly fine" is being an anti-Nintendo hater because I dare put Nintendo together with Sony! Yeah, right, I'm the one not being objective here...)
My conclusion was this:
| Faelco said:
Like I said, TLOU's micro transaction are not pay to win and don't bother me when I play the MP. I liked their SP DLC, Left Behind. So I trust them about Uncharted 4. Maybe I'll be wrong about it, but they didn't do anything until now to lose my trust. |
You're right, I'm a dangerous fanatic using "It would be better if it was free" and "I trust them, maybe I'll be wrong".
You can continue like this, you're only showing that I'm the one here using pros and cons and nuancing my posts... But now, what does this have to do with anything about the Switch? Or are you just searching 1 and a half year old threads trying to find a "Ah, you were wrong back then!" moment as an argument to prove that I'm wrong now? (and wrong about what exactly?) That would be a great argument, for sure...
Could we get back on topic now?







