By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Faelco on 03 September 2015
Edit Thread
DerNebel said:
Faelco said:
DerNebel said:

Is Mario Kart the topic of the thread? I don't think so.

 

I know... And? The subject is "Naughty Dog's greed". It's not greed if the rest of the industry does it too, it's normal business. That's all. And that's why talking about other companies doing the same thing is relevant IMO.

I don't think it's relevant to specifically pick out other games (suspiciously even from opposing first parties) to make a point like this. Nintendo could be asking for an arm and a leg to play MK8 and that still wouldn't make me feel better about ND's practices, cause at the end of the day I want to play UC4 in multiplayer and am not interested in MK8, so that's the game where it's going to affect me, IF they lock the best weapons behind a paywall or something.

Sure doing something like Spemanig and pointing to other games in which a similar practice bugs him is fair, but just pointing fingers at other games to make ND look less bad is pretty useless imo.


What's the difference between Spemanig and me? :/ I play MK with friends, and our friend owning the Wii  U had to buy the DLC for us to use the new content, and it bugs me to ask my friend to pay more for us (even if we bring food or drinks, of course). We play Smash also, but not enough to buy the DLC so I can't talk about it. What is useless here? 

 

Like I said, TLOU's micro transaction are not pay to win and don't bother me when I play the MP. I liked their SP DLC, Left Behind. So I trust them about Uncharted 4. Maybe I'll be wrong about it, but they didn't do anything until now to lose my trust.