Veknoid_Outcast said:
I have to agree with Barozi. After World at War I was excited to see what Treyarch would do with Black Ops. Boy was I in for a rude awakening. Black Ops played like a rail shooter and Black Ops II was even worse, with those frustrating Strike Force missions. I couldn't bring myself to play part III. |
eh I liked both World at War and Black Ops (good story).
Better don't touch Black Ops III. I'm 4 missions in and the story is convoluted with your typical spec ops blah blah. You basically don't know who you're fighting with and against whom and why it matters, but who cares anyway. Some terrorists I think. Levels are mostly too dark, so you need to constantly use your ability to visually highlight enemies. No connection to BlOps or BlOps II. Game is glitchy. In-game cinematics run at about 20FPS for whatever reason. Enemies can be very unforgiving even on Recruit. Died multiple times due to grenades and rockets exploding in my face without any prior indication. That's typical Treyarch too. Dodging random explosions isn't challenging, just cheap.
On the plus side. You can sort of create your own character (very limited though).
I got it a few months ago for 6€. Glad I didn't pay more. Bought Advanced Warfare for 19€ back then and had much more fun (Kevin Spacey is awesome).
