The Switch is not another Wii U!

[bdbdbd]

zorg1000 said:

I never said anything about them not releasing new generations of devices, just that with each generation there will be a single family of devices rather than seperate devices with their own seperate libraries.

Not necessarily. Dedicated devices would actually make them more money. I was meaning that the unified platform may not be their final solution, as it depends largely on the competition on the market. If there's no real competition to worry about, separate platforms would be more profitable, as lots of people would buy both devices.

ps4tw said:

You: "In the real world, games like CoD and FIFA are the prime examples of games that casual gamers buy"

Reggie: "The fact of the matter is we know we create great content for younger consumers, we know we've got great content for more casual players, and we want fantastic content for that more active player who loves Metroid or Zelda but maybe also wants something like a BioShock 2 to play as well, and we also recognize that we don't create that type of content ourselves(Bioshock 2). We're not good at it and it's not a key focus area."

Call of Duty is far closer to Bioshock 2 then any of those other categories, so your idea that CoD is for casual gamers/players is categorically wrong, or you think you know better than Reggie. 

What part of "The entire health system is different" don't you understand? 

But where's the contradiction? Where did Reggie say casual gamers didn't play CoD? They play CoD and not Bioshock because CoD is popular while Bioshock isn't. And even then, Reggie said nothing about casual gamers not playing Bioshock either.

So, what the health system is like and how does it change the gameplay? You're still not telling me.