pokoko said:
I can't believe you keep arguing about semantics like this. |
I'm sorry, but aren't you the one who started these semantics by naming every single mini game in 1,2 Switch a game on it's own when every other breathing organism can see it's a collection? Here's what you wrote:
pokoko said:
Arms isn't a gimmick game? Seriously? What about milking, shaving, sword fighting, gun fighting, bottle shaking, cat skinning, and whatever else I can't remember? You're going to tell me that they're probably deep and nuanced games, aren't you? Also, I'm kind of curious, but what does this have to do with Sony? |
Your comment made it pretty obvious that you didn't include them all into one game, but seperated them to make it sound bigger. Then you grasped a straw with digging out what Nintendo calls them, when again, everyone else can see it's a collection.







