|
Pemalite said:
Cost and power consumption. |
Well sure 14nm won't be as efficient as 7nm, but AMD also didn't have PS and XB to cater to before 28nm which could push them into finding a solution.
|
Pemalite said:
The chip would be so massive and power hungry, that the price would be ridiculous and you would need a Nuclear Reactor to power it, remember you need to include the CPU, chipset and other logic into that chip as well. |
Well a semi custom version of Ryzen would be expected, as well as the GPU. Sure your not talking a small die or power efficient, but the norm is usually something that fits that scenario just like the PS3 (minus the cell+gpu). It ran very hot and was very very power hungry until they shrunk the dies and came out with the PS3 Slim. Thats what I would expect out of the PS5 if 7nm was delayed. Unless they went with something like TSMC's new 12nm "half" node which is supposed to outperform 14nm apparently and is based on their 16nm node which is what is being used for PS4 and Pro I thought.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.







