By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
crissindahouse said:
Areym said:
As far as I understand it, that's awful. If it's not a bunch of fake news or lies or tied to a specific agendas/party, why restrict them? They are just informing people with the facts regarding our environment being in danger, what is the harm?

When nobody will hear about how some of Trump's decisions to create jobs will fuck up the planet then they won't complain as much about it. Putin is his great role model, he also manages to get most in his country on his side with telling them only what they shall hear^^

The harm is for Trump if people will read about all the negative parts of his decisions to create jobs. He just erases the negative parts. 

I know trump just basically gave the Go for the Dakota and keystone pipelines which many enviromentalist came out to oppose it or at least inform people about. It's pretty trouble that trump is restricting the EPA and also approving these two pipelines almost simultaneously. I'm not eloquent enough to pass judgement on this whole thing, but it doesn't paint a pretty picture



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian