By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
John2290 said:
Puppyroach said:

But you aren´t talkning about people meeting the minimum bar, you are talkning about people that are unqualified to be in the military. Meeeting the minimum bar means that you are qualified, so what´s the issue? And why do you have an issue if love occurs between soldiers? They l have to take the consequences´, and I assume most in the military will be professional. If they can´t be professional, then it´s not about the issue of women in the military, it´s rather the issue of soldiers not being competent anough for the job.

No, it is an issue of putting penis and vagina, all the pheramones and hormones and all that entails, beside each other in battle. Have you ever been in love? If you have you know you make rash decisions, your world view changes, you litterally can not stop fucking, five minutes pass alone and you can't get her out of your head. I can't imagine what effect this would have on the battlefield but I'm sure of one thing, it creates a situation where you are given an order but that love of yours takes priority...in the military everything hinges on the ability and training to take orders. And then there is the salty fuckers who can't get legit pussy and feel the need to take it for themselves.

And why would we limit a womans equal right to serve because some guys are to unprofessional to separate private and public life? Any father that serves is likely able to do it when struggling with being away from their family , then I expect any horny guy to be able do it as well, or look for another service. Limiting a womans rights because of men sounds more like an oppressive fundamentalist state than a democratic, open society.