Wyrdness said:
Nothing you have said debunks anything I've posted so whats your point? You just repeated what I said about DeNA, you harp on about SMR I'll simply point to the near Billion Pokemon Go made in 7 months which blows your argument about it not generating enough money out the water. We're not waiting for any revision 3DS will be done the end of this year and phased out afterward much like the Wii U was last year despite some of you insisting Switch wouldn't replace either. |
For one, Pokemon Go is a game that needs lots of constant maintainance, which goes against pretty much everything you've been pointing out with saving resources. Secondly, Pokemon Go is a third party game, with Nintendo's share being "pocket change" in relation to parties that are actually involved.
What you need to look, is Super Mario Run; that's a game that represents Nintendo's mobile strategy. Games they put out, are first and foremost ads Nintendo is able to monetise.
A model with better portability is the one that's supposed to replace 3DS. However, it's market that decides.
padib said:
Thank you. Why is this idea so difficult for people to grasp? |
Because.
Not only the third parties on 3DS, but also indies Nintendo's been warming up with Wii U (and 3DS) and it's likely Nintendo tries to do everything it can to have popular mobile games on Switch.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.







