By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
John2290 said:
Cobretti2 said:
how is this even an issue? as long as they pass the minimum bar set for whatever roll then that should be it.

With that attiude you aren't going to be winning any wars and I'd love to see you be drafted and end up along side someone who got in on the minimum ammount of effort. If a global war breaks out...I mean, I want our militaries (The western allies as is now) to be the best it can be, If I'm going to get drafted as a 26 year old ...who will be sent to "dig in" and seen as expendable I'd want no weak links around me, nor do I want to have to go against and combat a stressed mentally fatigued soldier who gets a rapey vibe for the women. There is also the possiblity of lovin going on within units and this poses the problem of greater priorities because when in love a court marshel or on site execution doesn't seem so bad when your lover is in danger. This would be a shambles of an army the ratio from Men to women were anywhere close. 

But you aren´t talkning about people meeting the minimum bar, you are talkning about people that are unqualified to be in the military. Meeeting the minimum bar means that you are qualified, so what´s the issue? And why do you have an issue if love occurs between soldiers? They l have to take the consequences´, and I assume most in the military will be professional. If they can´t be professional, then it´s not about the issue of women in the military, it´s rather the issue of soldiers not being competent anough for the job.