By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Insidb said:
bdbdbd said:

Yeah. Remember the early multiplatform games on PS3 that looked like crap in comparison to 360? Or the 360 launch games that visually can't match even Metroid Prime 3? I'm willing to accept "side by side comparisons" as a valid proof of system power, as long as we can say it works with every system, not just what we want to cherry pick to support our own argument.

I mean, we already have comparisons of PS3 being more powerful than Wii U, 360 being more powerful than PS3 and Wii being more powerful than 360. 

That was the infamous cell processor, though: Sony was greatly maligned for the closed architecture of the PS3. Neither MS nor Nintendo made such a boneheaded move. Also, XBox 360 came out in 2005, the PS3 came out in 2006, and the WiiU came out in 2012.

If the WiiU came out a year after the PS360 and had peculiar architecture, there'd be some justifications for a comparative lack of performance. Watch DF's videos, however,  and you will see Watch Dogs and Tekken perform best on PS3, and Bayonetta perform best on XBox 360. 

What lack of performance? It is a lot more powerful than Wii. You know, you compare the games on their lead platform to something that's just been ported to. Secondly, if you already have years of experience in with the architecture, it's going to better optimised anyway - the two reasons that resulted in the Wii games looking better than the 360 launch games, and 360 games looking way better than PS3 games. 



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.