Hiku said: I thought I did show you where the praise is, so I take that as you not being aware of what Metacritic is? As for articles about the Wii crowd, they've been written by industry analysts and gaming journalists alike. It was a phenomenon that intrigued the whole gaming world. The fact that you are here, posting on this forum, means you are probably not part of that Wii crowd that we're refering to. They were not the only ones who bought the system, after all. |
Oh, but I am that Wii crowd. I'm here back again because of the interest in Switch. It's not like I wasn't away for five to six years just because I didn't care about the forum, but didn't care about the games after Nintendo started killing the Wii.
You don't obviously understand how business analysis work. They aren't analysing the market, but where the actual investments in the industry are going: trying to guess where the investors are putting their money next. It doesn't really matter who's buying and why, as long they're buying. If you'd understand the consumer space, you would not be an industry analyst, you'd be one of the guys buying the analysis. And gaming journalists have no idea what the market is in the first place. Anyone who followed gaming media back in the Wii days knows it.
Why would anyone interested in Angry Birds would be interested in Splatoon? I know one is free and the other is not, but that has nothing to do with being interested in something. Could you explain? Why Candy Crush or Farmville would suit them better? It was you who said so, and I'd like to know why? Otherwise that's just blowing hot air.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.