By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
JRPGfan said:

am I the only that thinks the OP makes no sense?
Hes pulling numbers out of his arse without explaining where he gets them from.

Somehow 471 gflops becomes 707 gflops.
but maybe it has extra cores and then with its gpu speed it could be 921 gflops!
but then no, thats to much, it wouldnt run full speed, so that 921 is actually just 710 gflops.


what?

Op doesnt explain anything.
I still think the most likely situation is the one Eurogamer gave us.
150 gflops (portable) and 397 gflops (docked).

They atleast explain why they believe its has 256 cores, and what speed those run at ect ect.

Op just pulls numbers outta his butt :p

The Foxconn leak had details that are impossible to guess like the orange and blue Joycons and the exact type of battery the Switch is using, the leak also had performance higher than what EG had, the Switch event pretty much confirmed it as a legit leak, Eurogamer may have had correct information that was outdated as they admitted sitting on it for months while the Foxconn leak was most likely from up to date units.

This is exactly why I believe the Foxconn leak is the most current up to date on the hardware! Not saying Eurogamer's is wrong, but perhaps just a bit outdated information. Someone at Eurogamer replied on NeoGaf that their clock speed info was from the Fall according to their source, but no leakers yet have been as accurate as the Foxconn leaks.

The Foxconn leaks would only make the Switch 20% more powerful than what we previously believed so people don't have to feel so threatened as if it's some special sauce and suddenly we have a portable PS4...