Would you buy a "Switch TV"?

[nuckles87]

RolStoppable said:

d21lewis said:

Lot of variables. I mean, what if you already had a PS3 or PS4? You could just use what you already had. And if Nintendo went this route, who says they had to do it now? They could wait a year.

To be honest, I don't even know what I'm defending. I guess, that there's a possibility and all of those "It costs too much" or "I don't want a portable" people could finally shut up.

Then again, the Vita (with its abysmal fist party support) wasn't a success. Maybe a non portable Switch would just follow suit.

If you already owned a DualShock 3 or 4, you would have a superior controller to the actual Vita, especially if remote play was among your reasons to buy a Vita. But a similar controller scenario obviously cannot work for Switch.

And yeah, lots of people are screaming "too expensive". Then they just shouldn't buy one at launch. Price and bundle options are only going to get better after launch.

You don't like it, you don't buy it.

More or less how  see it. The Switch has a set of features to attract consumers: a combination of portability and console gaming, motion controls, and access to Nintendo's library. If that ain't worth $300 to you, wait for a price cut. The whole console is already designed around the portability concept. Stuff like the powerful mobile processor and motion control are all also part of the cost. Is a screenless Switch at $200 really all that appealing?