By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Green098 said:
No, the whole major selling point of the thing is the fact that its a portable console.

Vita also.. still.. the 99$ Vita TV could had been a succes if Sony had suportet it better.

If people (like me) dont really need the portable part.. a 199$ "Switch TV" could be what I would choose.. But still only 100$ to get the hole Switch experinces (portable and touch) Is to litle..

But if "Switc TV" was 149$ I think I would choose that.. (but i'm also pretty broke)

 

BUT.. And read this.. pretty important in this debat..

I dont think Nintendo will make "Switch TV"... I think The TV producers will make "Em"

I totally think that Nvidia and Nintendo will start to offer TV manufactors that use tegra to power theire TV.. % of all game sold..

Nvidia working With Nintendo (for decades) can take on the hole casual marked this way... sell games to people that dont even has a console... think if future smart tv comes with "N-channel" and has.. (lets say) Mario sunshine preinstallet.. and BOTW and Splatoon 2 demos) and mayby 2 joycons