By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MDMAlliance on 18 January 2017
Edit Thread
Sh1nn said:
MDMAlliance said:

I missed that part, but still I'm not entirely convinced that those are the only things that will end up being influenced (though they are kind of a big deal on their own anyway).


However, I'm not doubting Digital Foundry's information.  I am saying that they never said what the GFlops of the Switch were, and the way people are extrapolating that information is from information that doesn't exist to us right now (wasn't in the DF article).

it was.

DF said the leaked specs are real and recent:

Thought by many to be out of date or fake, we can confirm that Nintendo has briefed developers recently with the same information.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-nintendo-switch-spec-analysis

  • GPU: 256 CUDA cores, maximum 1GHz
Now we know numbers of cuda cores and gpu clock, so we can get flops numbers.
157gf portable, 393gf docked

I guess I missed that part, but I don't think that we really know the full story for the Switch quite yet.  

If I'm not mistaken, FLOPs aren't an exact measurement of performance (though is the best we can probably get right now as a single number)