padib said:
VAMatt said:
Its illogical to tell people that the value they assign to a game is wrong. Value, especially on something that's basically art, like a video game, is completely subjective. So, a game is worth whatever a prospective buyer says it is, and they can assign that value based on whatever criteria they want.
The OP attempts to tell readers how they must evaluate the value of a game. I'm guessing that you were basically just explaining your thoughts on value of Nintendo games. But, the way it is written, the OP tells people that if they don't assign value in the same way that you do, then they are wrong.
|
That wasn't my point at all. My point was to say that the opposite logic is invalid, which you seem to agree with me about.
The opposite side was arguing that since the PS4 has certain games and is priced relatively the same, that the value was much higher (in general). They didn't say: to me. They stated it as a generality.
So I wanted to make it clear that the market evaluated things differently.
If I was unclear then I made the same mistake as the people I meant to correct and then I suck.
If so, my bad.
|
Got it. I guess I misunderstood.
