Wyrdness said:
Actually it does. Nintendo pays a license to put games on VC but Nintendo has to approach publishers and choose which games go on VC. So anytime you complain about a certain Sega or Konami game not on VC it's not Konami or Sega's fault, it's because Nintendo didn't pick that certain game to be on the platform. Nintendo has to approach companies about their games and negotiate, information no doubt would be exchanged on how the system generally. |
And how many games does 4cornergames have available on virtual console? clue: zero, it was founded in 2010 and the company hasn't actually released a full game yet.
So please, tell me why one of their developers would know nintendo licensing information for virtual console when they don't even have a game available yet, let alone one that would be put on virtual console.
Nintendo talks to the license holders for the retro games they wish to re-release on virtual console, when the publisher/developer of that game isn't Nintendo themselves - This is between nintendo and publishers/developers of past-gen titles, it has nothing to do with modern games, nothing to do with indies, and would not be brought up with indies because there is *NO POINT* in doing so.
Especially when the only game theyre even working on looks like this:
But hey, you'll see for yourself in 2 months that her guess was wrong, so defend it all you want.
