Conina said:
If you pay 3 years for PS+ you have access to 216 games after that time (at least 72 PS4-games, probably around 90 PS4-games thanks to cross-buy titles). If you let your subscription run out, you temporarily lose access to these games. But if you renew that subscription you get access to the 6 games of that month + access to the other 216 games. If you pay 3 years for XBL Gold you have access to 72 XBO-games and 72 (XBO-compatible) 360-games. If you let your subscription run out, you temporarily lose access to these 72 XBO-games but keep access to the 72 (XBO-compatible) 360-games. If you renew that subscription you get access to the 4 games of that month + access to the 72 XBO-games. If you pay 3 years for Nintendo Online subscription you have access to one SNES- or NES-game (and zero Switch-games) in the last month of the subscription. If you let your subscription run out, you have access to none of NES- or SNES-games of these 3 years. If you renew that subscription only get access to the VC-game of that month (and zero Switch-games). Do you really not see the difference between these subscription models and their different value? |
I do. The first two gives terrible indie games I don't want to play just as an excuse to pay for online. The other gives me opportunity to play Top Gear and other great games with thounsands of people online as a bonus for an ONLINE subscription.
